Kiwi wrote:
As everybody knows, aluminium flexes and will accommodate any stresses involved. That's why aircraft need no airframe inspections or maintenance. Timber, as everybody also knows, suffers from timber fatigue, and so is not suited to off-road travel.
Michael
Kiwi,
What utter rubbish and total lies.
Aluminium corrodes and suffers from metal fatigue. Rivets also work/move and enlogate their holes. Electolysis also accurs where dis-similar metals come into contact.
Metal aircraft are subject to some of the toughest annual inspections in the planet. Those that are not properly maintained generally fail with catastrophic consequences.
The graveyard in Arizona is full of metal aircraft that have reached the end of their life.
Timber aircraft have an unlimited life with proper care and inspections.
My background......pilot for 43 years.....sport aircraft builder, Vans RV4 and Vans RV6.....aircraft restorer, DH82A Tiger Moth.
Another point to consider.....why have Boeing spent years and 100's of millions developing composite materials both major and minor ???? to escape the corrosion and metal fatigue problem that has hounded the aviation industry for years. A lot of people seem to agree with Boeing's direction with 850+ orders for the Dreamliner.
I'm sure Mowog is more than capabile of doing his own reseach, and sussing out the good from the not so good.
Cheers,