Been think about this and looking at the new cover and I do see what you mean.
As mentioned, for me (and many other I meet on the road and through foums etc) it is about freedom (i.e. not being forced into C'parks, while for others it can mena free (without cost) and the way it is on the cover can be seen as the later, especially if not aware of some previous editorial/articles addressing that.
It is the terminology that can become convoluted; hence my post 'What's in a Name' back in early Sept:
viewtopic.php?f=67&t=11301&start=0The importsant thing is that vested interests dont have the power to stop, inhibit, restrict, free, low-cost, budget, independent ; call it what you will. If they can erode one they WILL erode them all. That was/is my intention.